NESTOR
Destefanis What should be the analyst's desire to operate correctly? J. Lacan, Sem. XI, 1964.
This poster was launched around a question ... what about the desire of the analyst involves [1] ...? and spun at subsequent meetings by prosecuting this not knowing about a topic that nuclear and questioned at a specific time of training, ending in what is, from a very personal perspective-a point that the question a bit limited : it is an enigma, but not in the sense that what can not theorize or use, either as a matter of entelechy Lacanian difficult to circumscribe, but the desire analyst makes the enigma-at different levels-an operational role: the experience of holding a practice analysis and allows that one can speak of a cure, that is made for the purpose of practice, with respect to the analyst's place in that device asks to make the intervention of court, the only way to enable a subject effect in the construction of the transfer, and finally this enigma is also the final analysis while the authorization is given to the rotation of the position of the analysand the analyst, and a unique feature of the invention does happen.
* * * Who can say who is an analyst who cast the first stone, who can define what being an analyst, to write a dictionary, who has applied himself "this is my desire, enclose it in a museum ... Psychoanalysis is exercised as a discursive practice as defined by Jacques Lacan in Seminar excommunicated, a thousand times may be necessary to speak, and on the other hand the desire is articulated not articulable and then what about something that appears only articulated with respect to a place where it is exercised but not defined? Psychoanalysis is not suitable for encyclopedic knowledge, or cheap and simplistic classifications, also favors long, depending on who writes humble approach, an artificial timeline when actually required is an act of reading that thinking conceptual route swings that are going to come along the Thing, surrounding the hole. In principle, no doubt, and to move a step, it is désir ... desire.
It is the desire, but a particular desire, a desire warned, as circumscribed to the test device and when I can make use of it, from a place that embodies asymmetric with respect to his patient, the analyst. It is a desire of someone who has done a tour, but no one knows about. Lacan in Seminar X, scolds his assembly and asked many words, to whom they hold less of trouble to you or your patients? Question that is suspended over it. Two formulas travel
the seminar and approach the issue. On the one hand the anguish Lacan scored as medium, medium, or intermediate, but not a mediator, between the enjoyment and desire, and secondly it explicit that it is love that makes the desire to indulge the enjoyment [2] . Both explicit
which enables analysis and what becomes of it effective against a real, as opposed to impossible.
must go through that point of anguish in the analysis, so that his background is in sight in order to and then be possible to meet the desire. If the anxiety is not cheating, it is both a real butt, as always escapes the object or raises a very particular order: The real object as an irreducible (that's worked for Lacan Seminar at the height of X, then I called a real false) that represents the subject as a loss. If anxiety is a sign of warning me of something [etwas] the subject, indicates a basal uncertainty of a concussion against the desire of the Other, while I do not know what object to the Other that appears threatening. Now, the question would be what happens when the anguish against the desire of the Other, is actually against the desire of the analyst, as he holds his own desire in the size of the category you are working? It could establish here the analyst's desire is allowing just go beyond the anguish in the analysis, that is beyond the wall of anxiety. It is what allows it to follow the path to the insistence of a claim that is repeated and repeated, a turn around in more or less implies that there was no effect subject. In turn, this effect subject requires an act of reading [3] is possible when the analyst does not respond to demand, scored the insistence that the subject through I can recognize what it is. Echoes Lacan the subject matter in these words:
"What is the Other's desire while this occurs rodeo? This is where the signal takes on its value. Although it occurs in a place we can call topologically self, certainly concerns to someone else. [...] If you turn on the self, the subject is to be warned of something, namely, a desire, or of a lawsuit does not concern any need, that does not pertain to anything more than my self ie I questioned. Let's say I aborted. [...] Is directed to me, if you will, as expected, and, much more so, as lost. Request my loss for the Other is in it. Is that anxiety. [...] Actually, [the Other's desire] not recognize me or know me [...] He questioned, interrogated me at the very root of my own desire as a, as a result of that desire and not as an object. And that's what it points in a temporal relationship of background, I can not do anything to break the capture, except to commit it. [...] This is the time dimension of anxiety, this time dimension is that of analysis. If I get caught in the effectiveness of the analysis, because the analyst's desire arouses in me the size of the wait. " [4]
then occurs, a coating between two faults, a joint between two overlapping gaps that become compact. The desire of the analyst as missing-in-being comes to meet-that is involved activity-that which is lame in the patient's speech. Find the cause, put an x \u200b\u200bin suspense on what the speech is missing, failure or setback. "The purpose of this topology is to perceive what is the point of disjunction and conjunction, union and borders, which can only be occupied by the analyst's desire" [5] clarifies Lacan in Seminar XI.
The second principle, which proposes love as allowing the enjoyment condescend to desire, I can think mainly about love of transference, as Freud postulated. The analyst analytical part of the symptom as it is played on the sexual reality of unconscious. One way into thinking this analysis is to place the analyst as one who knows how to steal the patient that "melon" [6] so precious it is the object, an object that is necessary to clarify and built by the gap in his tour of drive built into your thirst for satisfaction, but also as the object cause of desire, ie, as an engine. This writing and the invention of Lacan of the place where there is nothing, and where such failure is structural, or does not belong strictly to the subject, or the Other, but that is the space of intersection, and disjunction between the two. The topological location of the object is a re-cut, cutting a part of the subject in its constitution; that is, the reel that comes and goes in the fort-da-as read Lacan in Seminar XI, "but also a reduction of the enjoyment of the Other, while I am no longer around to the Other. This peculiar object of this object to the analyst performs face, makes it look and lends shape to embody a place to unravel another transfer, to be loved, but also to pay. This and further, expressing at the same seminar Lacan bluntly when he exclaims that "it is necessary that the analyst has tits, now you have tits does not mean that they are no longer" suck. " There is no satisfaction there, but be enacted full enjoyment positions, nor is based effectiveness analysis in a dialectic of frustration, but when the patient transfer full love questioned why I want this further in any of its myriad forms, and mixed with ideal, claims or complaints "What ails you of me? "," why must I always say ... "etc, the analyst collects the boomerang released and returns it as a lurch in the neck. - "I do not mean anything, I do not want no ideal for you, I do not propose any particular object to their satisfaction", only makes you see what you are saying more in her words, anything less has been said . A form of enjoyment libidinal still other possibilities unleashed, in a way to say, pushy, singular, draws a significant, while that should encourage an elaboration of what worked. It is, above detailed, which transfer the love in the analyst is paid to play and produces game-like the dead on the bridge, providing a vacuum to be run. In Lacan Seminar devotes to "The Banquet or the love of Plato, out in accordance with developed so far on this feature that highlights the love
" Love can only go around this island, this area of \u200b\u200bbeing . And the analyst on the other hand, can only think that any object can fill. Here is where we, analysts, we are driven to oscillate at that limit where, with any object, once it has entered the field of desire, the question arises what are you? There is no object worth more than another-this is grief around which focuses the analyst's desire " [7] . Facing
patient demand, does not result in any order, but not reject what they say in the complaint or request in the application, but gives a different place, that place is that which is allowed by the function of desire the analyst, it is necessary to take into account in each practice, and it is necessary to reflect about each analyst. That place limits the enjoyment, it limited the potential treatment of symptoms in its real face, loss of enjoyment that saying implies, and can travel around to realize if you live, whether it acts as the desire aroused.
analyst as a face of a subsequent theorizing Lacan, as is the theory of the four speeches, but the desire of the analyst as a vacuum, as the site of an x, it can be taken as a direct antecedent , and also as a bridge to what the French psychoanalyst will nominate later. Specifically, if one takes into account that in the discourse of the analyst is the object which acts as agent, but who works in this logic is the place of the Other, that is, according to the analyst's speech, the subject divided. However, an analysis is not a speech, much less, and it is important to emphasize that what enables movement between discourses is love, understood as a transfer.
In 1964, ie next year's seminar on anxiety, Lacan is expelled and negotiated by colleagues for his teammates, even some of their own analysands, abandoned the intention to address "The Name of the Father" as a topic of his seminar , and write-write it orally, as does the word letter for those who come, the seminar "The Four Fundamental Concepts ...", while a key text for the subject matter" From Freud's Trieb and desire the analyst. " At this time Lacan is wondering how it should be the formation of analysts, so that means or ignores Freud at the time, so its proposal upset. Finally, in this context, the analyst's desire regains importance, and Lacan adds a plus of value to the category in question, while not only ranks as an operative function that depends on the effectiveness, ethics, and address to take in the analysis, but the lines of a political and epistemological. Not surprisingly, in this seminar, Lacan posits the Freudian unconscious and the unconscious of the hysterical, writing about Freud's desire [8] Psychoanalysis did cause to protect it from a place of mystical religion. At the same time, begins to question his own, leading to what will be the School as a community experience, as the place where knowledge production and sharing experience from the place of the analysand, an analysand who knows his fault, ie articulated his desire in his analysis and can make new motor causes. Some of this can be found in the last sentence of Seminar XI, where, not coincidentally, named the desire of the analysis, not the analyst. In his words,
"The desire of the analysis is not a pure desire. It is the desire for absolute difference, which intervenes when the subject confronted the primary signifier, go first to the position of subjection to him. Only there can arise the meaning of love without limits, being outside the bounds of the law, the only place where you live. " [9]
That becomes the analyst's desire as a vector of what is to analysis and implies that the pass for Psychoanalysis and the analysand who is facing significant primary that has marked. In the letter named above, is even more clearly the political and picks up where to go and how to anticipate what would happen and was on "The Direction of the Cure ..., these are the two this quote:
"Well, we have said without going into the spring of transfer, is the desire of the analyst who ultimately operates in psychoanalysis" [10]
"is to be formulated an ethic that integrates Freud's achievements over the desire: to put the issue on the cusp of the analyst's desire " [11] Both quotes
six years apart, are closely related and indicate a program that was built in Lacan beyond the difficulties and also taking advantage of them. If the inheritance of a father are the sins, if something in Freud's desire was not analyzed, as a matter impossible, to unravel, to probe the cause Freud, Lacan takes to clear their desire a clinical category, political and epistemological, the analyst's wish.
* * *
no intention to conclude, but to recap, it supports the hypothesis that the category of the analyst's desire for a side on the clinical level to an operational site of the analyst as an x, as a enigma, who goes to meet the patient's unconscious wish and on the other hand, the vagaries of thought in Lacan makes the analyst's desire to regain its strength and power once elucidated own desire in Freud and clear and put into action desire in Lacan, to become a proprietary tool of discursive practice that is psychoanalysis. BIBLIOGRAPHY
· Ariel, A and others, "Clinical problems in initiating treatment" Buenos Aires 1985.
· Belaga, G and others, "Current Pass" Ed Grama, Buenos Aires 2008.
· Eidelsztein, A, "The Psychoanalytic Clinic topology" Ed Letra Viva, Buenos Aires 2006.
· Freud, S; Works, "
- TXII," Clarifications on transference love "[1914] Ed Amorrortu, Buenos Aires 2004.
- TXII, "Remember, repeat and rework" [1915] Ed Amorrortu, Buenos Aires 2004
- TXVII, "The ominous" [1919]; Ed Amorrortu, Buenos Aires 2006.
- TXX "Inhibition, Symptom and Anxiety" [1926] Ed Amorrortu, Buenos Aires 2004.
· J. Lacan, The Seminar;
- Book VIII, "The transfer [1960-1961]; Ed Polity Press, 2003
Buenos Aires - Book X," The Trouble "[1962-63]; Ed Paidós; Bs Ace, 2007.
- Book XI, "The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis" [1964-65]; Ed Paidós, Buenos Aires 2003.
- Book XVII, "The reverse of Psychoanalysis" [1970-71]; Ed Paidós, Buenos Aires 2004.
· Lacan, J, Writings, Volume II:
- "The Direction of the Cure and the Principles of his power" [1958] Ed SXXI, Buenos Aires 2003.
- "From Freud's Trieb and the analyst's desire" [1964] Ed SXXI, Buenos Aires 2003.
· Lacan, J.; Seminar IX, "The Identification" (unpublished) [1961-1962] Rodríguez Ponte version for internal circulation of Sigmund Freud School of Buenos Aires
· Leserre, A, "The analyst's desire a question of horizon "Clinical Institute of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires 2005.
· Kait, G., "Anxiety Lacanian and object cause of desire" Ed UNR, Rosario 2006.
· Yankelevich H., "Logic of enjoyment" Ed Homo Sapiens, Rosario 2002.
[1] me know to be wise and good as the product of a fastidious reading of a forcing in the form of questions, so you can say that two points are included what does the analyst's desire in their different dimensions: ethics, clinical, political and epistemological?, and what implications cartel members are on the subject?
[2] such elucidations are considered by Lacan in its 10 th Seminar (1963-64) have the character of formulas that run throughout the seminar, which is why not go to the appointment.
[3] These terms refer to work Lacan makes about bullfighting bound at the Seminar IX (unpublished) and Eidelsztein working on "A Psychoanalytic Clinic topology."
[4] Lacan, J., The Seminar, Book X "Anguish" [1963], Class XI, pg. 167, Ed Paidós, Buenos Aires 2006.
[5] Lacan, J., The Seminar, Book XI, "The four concepts ..." [1964], Class XIII, p. 168; Ed Paidós, Buenos Aires, 2004.
[6] This expression refers to the words "Clinical problems in initiating treatment", Ariel and others, Buenos Aires 1985.
[7] Lacan, J., The Seminar, Book VIII "transfer" [1960-61], Class XXII, Pág.440; Ed Paidós, Buenos Aires 2003.
[8] Lacan That question had been working since the Sem. II, when analyzing the dream of Irma's injection (as a first pillar that may apply), but in Seminar XI bet and so is his work, Freud comes off, but still hold it as strongly base.
[9] Lacan, J., The Seminar, Book XI "The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis" [1964], Class XX, p. 284, Ed, Buenos Aires 2003.
[10] Lacan, J.; Writings, Volume II, "From Freud's Trieb and the analyst's desire" [1964], p. 823; Ed SXXI, Buenos Aires 2001.
[11] Lacan, J.; Writings, Volume II, "The direction of the cure ..." [1958], p. 595; Ed SXXI, Buenos Aires 2001.
0 comments:
Post a Comment