CLARA Casalegno
"Preliminary interviews are a melee (Lacan). Raise the body as an obstacle to love can only encourage it to develop. The analyst is the best object of love because no body. " [1]
Starting a return to work earlier discussed, as well as reaching out to others, doing a directed reading thinking of issues that make clinical psychoanalytic opened many questions and triggers. He also took us to reflect on our experience as analysands analytical, which is at our disposal. Thus consider Work your way through the lineup device involved a shift in relation to can begin to take a clinical way of thinking analytically.
An overarching question was: How does the analytic work, "that is, what would be the way in which the analyst stands in dialectical experience that makes psychoanalysis, as Lacan says, for establishing the size dialogue leading to the patient may develop malaise that afflicts, and can make a change in his subjective position.
believe that the analytic thinking brings us back to listen to Freud, who did not stop insisting that one of the main requirements that make the analytical technique is the handling of transference, one that plays a fundamental role in the treatment and that paradoxically emerges as the strongest resistance. Therefore the transfer was raised by Freud as the greatest obstacle but at the same time the tool available to the analyst for the promotion of healing.
Lacan, the seminar on the transfer states: "At the beginning of the analytic experience, remember, was the love [2] , thinking about the concern that invaded Freud at the beginning, which led him to suggest that a of the most dangerous traps that can meet the analyst is the emotional involvement with their patients. This concern was presented from the knowledge available regarding analysts who fell into this trap, as occurred between Breuer and Anna O, Jung's Sabina Spielrei, as well as the relationship with Elma Fereczi. Therefore, love appears in the analytic treatment as a result of the transfer, from which we talk about transference love, the love that Freud described as genuine love, claiming to be satisfied, demanding exclusivity and showing revenge when does not reach the sought. In this way, then Freud argues that the transfer takes the form of love. Now, with the proposition of Lacan this love takes on a new form, because although highlights how the transfer is put into play a semblance of love, while holding what it is love of knowledge.
Thus we are dealing with the transfer as the core technology that allows an analytical device that is leading to, from an analyst's intervention is the possibility of a move in the analysand's subjective position. This is necessary to take into account that the analyst is put into play and this dimension of dialogue from the patient is in a subject person at the same time he assumes a knowledge of their suffering, so is that you can think about the role that an analyst must embody in order to reach cure. At this point it seems important to note that there is a double operation is at stake in a subject for an order of analysis, raises Marité Colovini: first, assumption of a knowledge that would answer to the riddle which contains the symptom and On the other hand, charges a subject of this knowledge of course, that's what Lacan called subject supposed to know. " [3]
When we think of transference love we still hold the question about what the position to be adopt an analyst. This leads me to read first so-called technical writings in which Freud thought precisely those issues that could be established on to the position that the analyst must take to lead the operation of the device. About this seems interesting to note first what Lacan said that arises when "an analyst does not overwhelm his analysands moral principles" [4] , leaving out quickly what is not analytic practice. Just remember that if you can speak of a technique is a technique in which not only comes with the word and what it is to leave the patient to talk, and of course, listen to, but beyond what he says. About listening to the patient, Freud argues in technical writing what would be the basis analytical device is something that from the outset the analyst conveys to his patient, and is the rule of free association, that it says everything that passes through his head, beyond saying he can not escape the moral questions and kind or nature. This fundamental rule has its other face is on the analyst, is the free-floating attention, is that the analyst does not notice anything raised by the analysand and pay all the same attention. Thus we speak of the rule that allows the construction of the analysis, resulting in the effects of language, thus allowing the emergence of any manifestation unconscious, because when we are a failed entity, a slip, a dream of forgetfulness ... this will be expressed in the dimension of language. "That's what the language, as they say, not only connotes, but denotes, for something ... something real stone that I stumble." [5]
Thus, approaching the issue of analytical technique and how this should be taken by an analyst, taking into account that there is no generalization possible and therefore falls outside the slit chance to follow any technical chart, it seems important to at least approach the proposals of Fereczi , because for years he corresponded with Freud, correspondence which wavered between agreements, partnerships and discussions. Freud, letters Fereczi always heard especially in regard to the analytical technique, which is evidenced by the numerous citations to it in its work.
The correspondence between Freud and Ferenczi can be dated from 1908 until his death Fereczi, 1933. In the volume covering the period of 1914-1916 can be seen a major concern both for social issues in which they were submerged. Short periods also reflect analysis by Freud Fereczi [6] , in which mainly Ferenczi expressed his ambivalence about marrying Gizella Elma or [7] . In this tangle of personal, social and professional development led some theoretical and technical principles of psychoanalysis,
One of the principles developed in this period is the withdrawal. In relation to the latter first think Freud transference love, arguing that it is appropriate to take advantage of this love taking it into account that the cure is not possible and morally opposed to it. Suggests that for this to be achieved it is important first that the analyst has made clear that that love is just a product of the transfer, a time of healing on the cross, and also brings into play the participation of the resistance exaggerates all externalities. The patient transferred to individual analyst's unconscious desires and that is why Freud does not see that the absence of those feelings of the patient reflects a mode of analytical method, since it would appeal to the repressed unconscious to be analyzed using it, but to return to repress. If Freud had been guided by moral principles that governed at the time would have planted it would be appropriate to ask the patient to leave those feelings to yourself or to stop treatment (as in the case of Breuer). At the same time, it remains clear that responding to the demand of the patient at an end that would be detrimental to both. About
abstinence seems very interesting to note a quote from Lacan that is made by Jean Allouch in a seminar given in July 2003: "... one of the purposes of silence is the rule of listening is just shut my love ..." [8] Lacan thus arises that the reason why analysts remain silent is the fact that when we are in the dimension of the word, the joy is always present, therefore argues that it is better to sit still make sense to subject (analysand) that delights in the word.
"The cure must be done on abstinence ..." [9]
In many passages of the correspondence between Freud and Ferenczi be seen how there is an effort to enforce or to avoid some situations that could jeopardize something about this rule so important. In "New Paths of psychoanalytic therapy" (1918) Freud returns to the question of withdrawal to what was in reference since 1912, making it clear that when we talk about abstinence is not thinking only of a possible romantic relationship between analyst and patient, but rather refer to the position mode to the suffering of patients, suggesting that treatment itself implies the need to sustain the condition of the subject so that this does not disappear before the results would be as short-lived, and how to achieve this would be the way of withdrawal or deprivation sensitive "and also named in this work.
address these issues pertaining to the place where you should position the analyst, Freud in principle stresses the importance of analysis to be submitted to the analyst. Also advised that an analyst position convenient for the analysand as he is the "coldness of feeling" [10] . The latter is something Fereczi often criticized for the fact that Freud did not take into account the analyst's empathy. Also the question of "activity" of the analyst was a point at which starred Fereczi and had a strong influence on Freud's work. While Freud
activity of the analyst should refer to expose the patient's resistance and make conscious the repressed for a time considered in a number of cases is also important that the analyst's activity continues to support the patient in relation to this resistance with which they are has to do, and so much Freud to Ferenczi had in mind in this respect somewhat longer in their hands thinking about this field of analytical technique, although it involved the future of his strongest point discussion. Thus for some time talked about the "active technique" [11] . In a series of cases Freud applied this technique activated by setting a deadline for analysis itself, ie setting a date for the purpose of analysis, arguing that often the patient uses the strength of the analysis to become embroiled in an issue that allows you to delay any decision regarding what would and would lead to a change, as I saw that was the case of Fereczi that clung to delay analysis of decision regarding their marriage. Years later
Fereczi writes in his diary a criticism of the analyst's callous attitude, arguing that it is harmful to both the patient and the analyst. To Fereczi naturalness, sensitivity and optimal behavior described the attitude that must be sustained analyst for the benefit of the analytic situation itself. Also in his paper entitled "Progress in the analytical technique" a critique of the way he had begun to take the relationship between analyst and patient, arguing that in principle be an emotional relationship had become an overly intellectual, raising that if there was an increased emphasis on affection would give rise to a positive transfer at the same time would enable more successful treatment outcomes. By this time Freud
writes Fereczi had moved away from the way they shared in relation to modes of thinking issues about psychoanalysis but denies any passage Freud Ferenczi is an analyst as if it had happened in other cases, and their correspondence continued until the death of Fereczi.
on abstinence and the analyst's activity I find interesting the petition of Jean Allouch in relation to the analyst "actively refrains", referring to often intervene in a way that sustains is a refrain, and sometimes failing to intervene, it is leaving somehow enter into the matter. This suggests that Lacan said in relation to an act not to be confused with an action analytical engine, which makes us understand how silence can only be a way of intervening. To think this is necessary to take into account the vital role of the transfer, if it is established, there is no possibility of intervention in stroke on the part of the analysand.
This is how I found it interesting to investigate the transfer, which is what embodies the very possibility that an analysis there, allowing me to think like the same issues in relation to this technique which has nothing more and nothing less than a word , a possible way to "apply" and trying to understand how it transcends what is commonly understood by technique, even though many times the names in this way, because it is the opposite of rigid steps to follow what is excluded from the time the analyst does not know in advance what the patient might say or not. I think you can not stop name when addressing an attempt to think as "must" an analyst position, although this becomes a formula, the question of Lacan in relation to the axis which moves the analyst is the desire, arguing that the analyst's desire is one that allows the development of the analysis itself. To this the analyst must ensure that your desire enclose always a question mark for the analysand, providing the driving force that gives movement to the analysis together.
Bibliography:
_ Allouche, J. Notes on the seminar "angry love? July 2003. Translated by Mark Esnal. _
Ferenczi, S., Problems and motives of psychoanalysis, Paidos Editorial, Buenos Aires, 1966. _
Ferenczi, S., No sympathy there is no cure. The Clinical Journal, 1923., Editorial Amorrortu, Buenos Aires, 1997. _
FREUD, S Ferenczi, S. Complete correspondence [1914-1916], editorial Synthesis, Madrid, 2001. _
FREUD, S., On the dynamics of the transfer [1912], Volume XII, Works, Publisher Amorrortu, Buenos Aires, 1996. _
FREUD, S., with your doctor about psychoanalytic treatment [1912], Volume XII, Construction Complete Amorrortu Editorial, Buenos Aires, 1996. _
FREUD, S. "Clarifications on transference love ', New advice on the technique of psychoanalysis, III [1915], Volume XII, Works, Publisher Amorrortu, Buenos Aires, 1996. _
FREUD, S. New ways of psychoanalytic therapy [1919], Volume XVII, Works, Publisher Amorrortu, Buenos Aires, 1979. _
Lacan, J., "Statement on the transfer," Writings I [1953-54], Paidós Editorial, Buenos Aires, 2006. _
Lacan, J., transfer, Seminar 8 [1960-61] Paidós Editorial, Buenos Aires, 2006.
_ Lacan, J., Lecture delivered at the museum of science and technology of Milan on February 3, 1973.
http://www.ecole-lacanienne.net
[1] Allouch, J. Notes on the seminar "Annoyed love? July 2003. translated by Mark Esnal.
[2] Lacan, J. Transfer, conference 8 [1960-1961], Chapter I, pp. 12. Paidós Editorial, Buenos Aires, 2003.
[3] COLOVINI, M, PhD Thesis: "The erotomania, the delusion of being loved: a crazy woman?" Time and address issues of healing, P. 10.
[4] Lacan, J. Lecture at the museum of science and technology of Milan on February 3, 1973.
[5] Lacan, J. Lecture at the Museum of Science and Technology of Milan on February 3, 1973
[6] are three brief periods in which Ferenczi was subjected to analysis with Freud.
[7] It seems important to stress, transfer of love that both patients had been Fereczi, and at the same time they were mother and daughter. Finally Fereczi married Gizella not without Freud's insistence that he saw that fact as the only outlet for Fereczi normal.
[8] Allouch, J. Notes on the seminar "modest love? July 2003. translated by Mark Esnal
[9] FREUD, S. Remarks on transference love, new tips on the technique of psychoanalysis, III [1915], p. 168 Volume XII, Works, Publisher Amorrortu, Buenos Aires, 1996
[10] FREUD, S. Advice to doctor about psychoanalytic treatment [1912] p. 114. Volume XII, Works, Publisher Amorrortu, Buenos Aires, 1996.
[11] In 1918 Freud and Ferenczi presented at a conference in Budapest the "active technique."
0 comments:
Post a Comment