Monday, October 13, 2008

Best Party Cruise Line Topless

: Notes on the memory trace and representation

RUBÉN Caligaris
afternoon / y Forms / and the woman I love / pain come
run / for / and happy
Francisco Urondo
[1]

footprint, language, clinical
One question that may arise is how important is investigating the track for the field of clinical psychology. And we can get closer to an answer, which circulated in the medical field are words. Put another way, psychoanalysis operates with the word.
And thus we see that in wanting to discuss the footprint began with the word. The difficulty we face is that, and this is going to hold, the problem of memory trace traverses the field of psychoanalysis. We need to go too deeply into this issue. We say the theory, but considering it as something that needs to happen practice [2] , and not as a mere abstraction to work a kind of "bookworm." Though we may require that the practice has some transferable, that perhaps what is transmitted is true theorization of the clinic, with a loss of certain aspects of the practice.
So theorizing is of the clinic. However, if there is anything that results in this clinic is that particular mode of social bonds resulting in the transfer in the analysis, the logical move drop of knowledge up to his subject's own history and start game one analyst is supposed to know. The operations that must be thought to give rise to this situation is that of language and the possibility of creating a speech.
Then, the importance of the footprint, which is the inscription, writing, and through the issue of language in psychoanalysis, both in practice and in his clinic and his theory.

Notes on the trail, interpretation, representation and temporality

Taking a translation of the German Spur Ritvo gives us, we say "has various meanings, many of which overlap with Castilian equivalent scope of the footprint: first print, then sign, mark, trace, indicates also the rail car and marine vocabulary wake left by boat. " [3] is what remains after an event happens. The present track of an absent presence.
Central to the concept of memory trace is that there is no interpretation. That is, to be figurative, if we see something written on a wall, we can say, "Sure they did spray, etc". If a trace is because the animal, for example, is no longer there, you need an interpreter to bring together different elements. Something has been there and it is not. Thus we
also the problem of representation. Tracks is reached via the analysis mnnémicas, the "shelling" representations. The tracks are combined, condensed, was transfigured, and thus arm representations. At one time charge representing an endowment, making gun signs and representations. The performances are put together to be invested by a load.
is based on how they are represented to be formed, for example, delusions of persecution (in Shreber) or symptom (remember that spot on the horse's mouth was talking about David).
footprints, and here we Derrida, "are the text of the unconscious." It is in the building of writing which holds the memory trace. Working on the last leg of the work of Freud, we find the great magic slate device. Its advantage is huge figurative, we have a perceptual surface (celluloid sheet) always ready to welcome new insights (P-CC system, which does not retain permanent traces, as argued from the Project) and permanent traces of the characters received (in the wax tablet.) Freud compares the cover composed of celluloid and the waxed paper with the receiving system of incentives and antiestímulo device, the wax slab with the unconscious system behind it, and the appearance and disappearance of writing, with the power of consciousness in terms of perceptions.
but delves deeper into this last point. There is a discontinuity in the flow of innervation to make the system P-Cc open the doors to perception. While the system remains invested in this way, perceptions receives and transmits consciousness accompanied by excitation into the unconscious mnemonic systems, when the endowment is withdrawn, consciousness is extinguished and the system operation is suspended. Freud constructs a metaphor, in which the unconscious, through P-CC system, extended to meet the outside world would withdraw antennae rapidly after these samples were taken from their excitations.
This is the mode of formation of psychic temporality. Is writing as an interrupt and restore contact between the layers psychic. There is an economy of writing, these discontinuities of psychological freight movements in relation to P-CC system, that open and close our doors to the outside world by establishing a repetitive sequence.
Freud notes a difference between our mental activity and the magic board. It can not produce from within a document, as it does our memory. In this regard, the representation of magic board is dead, does not work by itself, unlike our system mnemonic.

footprint of what was lost: the presence of an absence. His relationship with the transfer.

Following Derrida and taking what had already been raised, we say that the track has more to do with the erasure that the presence immutable, so indelible. We can approach this idea by evoking the experience of satisfaction. That perception, and that something is left. His image and that mnemonic memory trace of satisfaction associated with the need. And a remainder, a surplus which gives rise to desire, in turn allow the psychic functioning.
It will mark the presence of an absence. And will lead to a first writing structured psychological. [4]
That psychic tells us what Freud has to do with the unconscious. And take this concept as something alive, that keeps all kinds of relationships with the conscious. We can say that you can not think of psychoanalysis as a depth psychology. That is, both in the theories of Freud and, more explicitly, in Lacan's Oedipal structure found in the surface. That is, you can make an analogy with the purloined letter, which is before the eyes but not see it. In the analysis the unconscious is constituted in its effects on the production of utterance in which the letter appears as a slip, for example.
Freud says that the unconscious is continued in the offspring, it is affordable to the vicissitudes of life, continuing influences on the preconscious and in turn is subject to influences from the east. This allows us to revisit the issue of the memory trace, in their associative movements within the psychic systems, and thinking in relation to the transfer. That is, how these features of the object lost, missing, will determine the bond of transference love.

articles with the word. Word representation and representation thing.

On first reading the article one can understand the unconscious that Freud made a distinction between representation-thing as the unconscious itself, in relation to the image, and Representation-word, linked to the preconscious, which coordinates the representation of speech thing remains, leading to a classification that can also refer to the language, or a depth psychology.
You run a risk in that way, which would make our clinic. In the psychoanalytic clinic, as we said, moving words. Now is whether those words are always conscious?. We see the complexity. And in The Interpretation of Dreams Freud tells us that dreams are made of words as things. Those dreams, and constituted themselves into images from a text, a hieroglyph, a translation, which are essential interpretation, taking into account the associations between what is said, not regarding what they say with the figurative image in the dream. That is, words are broken, and operate with them the mechanisms of condensation and displacement. The words become ambiguous and changing operating roads, rails.
is in this bespoken in which the act is unconscious, is in the words of Lacan is the discourse of the Other. Words, and reflecting on the track that is that text that comes from the Other and that is the Other stage.
The relationship between the word and the print is extremely complex. At first one might think that the track is more related the text of the unconscious and the preconscious word. But in the multiple forms of relationship between the two systems, and to see that words can be treated as things, we see that there are several joints. We can say, the tracks will appear as a detail in the treatment of enunciation. In her words are split, and the unconscious mechanisms act on the surface. It is here that the tracks, always combined and at play in representations invested, are given birth in analysis. We

thus multiple vectors that may have this issue, not at all completed in this work. We think that the deepening, we have a better approach to this complex joint between practice, clinical and psychoanalytic theory. BIBLIOGRAPHY


Derrida, Freud and the scene of writing; Source: personales.ciudad.com.ar / Derrda / freud.htm. Guy Le Goufey
· Representation Freudian and Lacanian signifier.
Freud, S. The Unconscious, 1915, Ed Amorrortu, Volume 14, 2007.
Freud, S. Repression, 1915, Ed Amorrortu, Volume 14, 2007.
Freud, S. Magic slate, 1915, Ed Amorrortu, Volume 19, 2007.
Freud, S. Repression, 1915, Ed Amorrortu, Volume 14, 2007.
Freud, S. The neuro-psychoses of defense, 1895, Ed Amorrortu, Volume 3, 2007.
Lacan, J. Workshop 5, Ed Paidós, 2006.
· Ritvo, JB Del father. Policies of their genealogy. Cap: The trace in Freud, Freud's footprint. Letra Viva, 2004.
.

[1] Urondo, Francisco. Poetry anthology, Places, "so much love mark." Ed Planeta, 1999, p. 25.
[2] At this point is to challenge students who clamor for "more practical, less theory."
[3] Ritvo, JB Del father. Policies of their genealogy. Letra Viva, 2004. p. 169.
[4] It remains to be further , among other things

0 comments:

Post a Comment